own desing (not perfect but funcional) 2 parts .stl files in winrar archives
part1: +- 01h:03m without support +10% infill part2: +- 01h:44m with support +30% infill speed: 30 mm/s
.2 resolution
printed in anycubic kossel plus
not for resale thanks!!!
Meer formaten nodig? Als u een ander formaat nodig heeft, open dan alstublieft een nieuwe Support Ticket en vraag om een ander formaat. Wij kunnen uw 3D modelen van vorm veranderen naar: .stl, .c4d, .obj, .fbx, .ma/.mb, .3ds, .3dm, .dxf/.dwg, .max. .blend, .skp, .glb. We converteren geen 3D-scènes en formaten zoals .step, .iges, .stp, .sldprt.!
Lees meer
Download security handle for velux windows free 3d print model Gratis 3D-printmodel
stl
Van SanchiEsp
This is a very very interesting piece of work has Velux has stopped manufacturing the parts for their older Velux windows.
I am prepared to print it (got a quote of 109 euros at a local 3D print shop) ...but there is one thing I actually don't understand: how are the two parts security connected one to the other. When looking at the design, I have the feeling that one has to "clip" the part in the other one.
This raises two questions: 1/ is it required that the print material would be flexible enough in order to be able to click the two parts together? 2/ if it can be clipped "in", is it really a "security" handle? Isn't there a risk that it would be possible to force the window and "unclick it"?
Let's see if I get some answers to those two questions.
Imho, a better design would have been to make the two parts easy to connect at another angle (e.g. rotating further to the right) but to have a non cynlindric design for the interconnection, by example with a narrower parts that would prevent to "unplug" the parts.
Delen:
Verwante items Van security handle for velux windows free 3d print model
On-demand products/services
(e.g. “made to order” or “create your own” apps)
1
Unlimited
Business social media account owned and managed by the licensee
1
Unlimited
Physical advertisements for local, national, and global markets
Unlimited
Unlimited
Digital paid advertisements impressions
Unlimited
Unlimited
One native app, web app, or game downloaded or sold times, physical or digital end products
250 000
Unlimited
Use in a single (free and paid) end product
(more than one end user allowed)
Yes
Yes
Royalty-Free Usage
Yes
Yes
The Extended License for an item is two (2) times as expensive as the Basic License for the same item. For example, if you can obtain some 3D model under a Basic License for $20, the same model under an Extended License will cost you $40.
You cannot redistribute or resell items purchased under any type of license (Basic or Extended), whether separately or included in some kind of collection of 3D model resources. Lees meer
Yes, If the model is under Royalty Free license , you can use it as long as it is incorporated into the product and as long as the 3rd party cannot retrieve it on its own in both digital and physical form.
No AI Training License
Licenses marked with the "no AI" designation do not grant permission for utilizing the product in tasks related to machine learning or the training of neural network models, including generative AI models.
These conditions terms specified by SanchiEsp for the security handle for velux windows free 3d print model. Lees meer
Vraag productondersteuning
Berichten zijn uitgeschakeld door de gebruiker.
Sorry, u bent niet ingelogd of u bent nog niet geregistreerd op deze website!
Wir verwenden Cookies, um Ihre Erfahrung mit dieser Website zu verbessern. Mehr Informationen
I am prepared to print it (got a quote of 109 euros at a local 3D print shop) ...but there is one thing I actually don't understand: how are the two parts security connected one to the other. When looking at the design, I have the feeling that one has to "clip" the part in the other one.
This raises two questions:
1/ is it required that the print material would be flexible enough in order to be able to click the two parts together?
2/ if it can be clipped "in", is it really a "security" handle? Isn't there a risk that it would be possible to force the window and "unclick it"?
Let's see if I get some answers to those two questions.
Imho, a better design would have been to make the two parts easy to connect at another angle (e.g. rotating further to the right) but to have a non cynlindric design for the interconnection, by example with a narrower parts that would prevent to "unplug" the parts.